Pre-Referral Primary Care Blood Tests and Symptom Presentation before Cancer Diagnosis: National Cancer Diagnosis Audit Data

Author:

Cranfield Ben M.1ORCID,Abel Gary A.2,Swann Ruth34,Moore Sarah F.2ORCID,McPhail Sean3,Rubin Greg P.5,Lyratzopoulos Georgios13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK

2. University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter EX1 2HZ, UK

3. National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Leeds LS1 4AP, UK

4. Cancer Research UK, London E20 1JQ, UK

5. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK

Abstract

Background: Blood tests can support the diagnostic process in primary care. Understanding how symptomatic presentations are associated with blood test use in patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer can help to benchmark current practices and guide interventions. Methods: English National Cancer Diagnosis Audit data on 39,751 patients with incident cancer in 2018 were analysed. The frequency of four generic (full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, and inflammatory markers) and five organ-specific (cancer biomarkers (PSA or CA125), serum protein electrophoresis, ferritin, bone profile, and amylase) blood tests was described for a total of 83 presenting symptoms. The adjusted analysis explored variation in blood test use by the symptom-positive predictive value (PPV) group. Results: There was a large variation in generic blood test use by presenting symptoms, being higher in patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer who presented with nonspecific symptoms (e.g., fatigue 81% or loss of appetite 79%), and lower in those who presented with alarm symptoms (e.g., breast lump 3% or skin lesion 1%). Serum protein electrophoresis (reflecting suspicion of multiple myeloma) was most frequently used in cancer patients who presented with back pain (18%), and amylase measurement (reflecting suspicion of pancreatic cancer) was used in those who presented with upper abdominal pain (14%). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) use was greatest in men with cancer who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (88%), and CA125 in women with cancer who presented with abdominal distention (53%). Symptoms with PPV values between 2.00–2.99% were associated with greater test use (64%) compared with 52% and 51% in symptoms with PPVs in the 0.01–0.99 or 1.00–1.99% range and compared with 42% and 31% in symptoms with PPVs in either the 3.00–4.99 or ≥5% range (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Generic blood test use reflects the PPV of presenting symptoms, and the use of organ-specific tests is greater in patients with symptomatic presentations with known associations with certain cancer sites. There are opportunities for greater blood test use in patients presenting with symptoms that do not meet referral thresholds (i.e., <3% PPV for cancer) where information gain to support referral decisions is likely greatest. The findings benchmark blood test use in cancer patients, highlighting opportunities for increasing use.

Funder

Cancer Research UK

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference25 articles.

1. The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer;Emery;Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.,2014

2. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control;Rubin;Lancet Oncol.,2015

3. NICE Guidelines (2015). Suspected Cancer: Recognition and Referral. Guidance and Guidelines, NICE Guidance. Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12/chapter/1-Recommendations-organised-by-site-of-cancer#upper-gastrointestinal-tract-cancers.

4. Jensen, H., Tørring, M.L., Olesen, F., Overgaard, J., and Vedsted, P. (2014). Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: A population-based GP survey and registry study. BMC Cancer, 14.

5. Rethinking diagnostic delay in cancer: How difficult is the diagnosis?;Lyratzopoulos;BMJ,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3