Primary care staff’s views and experience of patients’ online access to their electronic health record: a qualitative exploration

Author:

Davidge GailORCID,Brown Lindsey,Lyons Moira,Blease CharlotteORCID,French DavidORCID,van Staa TjeerdORCID,McMillan BrianORCID

Abstract

BackgroundNHS England have announced plans to enable all adult patients to have full prospective access to their primary care record by default. Despite this, little is known about the views and experiences of primary care staff regarding patients’ online records access (ORA).AimTo examine the views and experiences of primary care staff regarding patients having online access to their primary care health record, and how this service could be supported and improved.Design and settingA qualitative study of a purposive sample of 30 primary care staff in England.MethodOnline semi-structured interviews with primary care staff were conducted between December 2021 and March 2022. Verbatim transcripts were analysed inductively using thematic analysis.ResultsMost staff agreed with the principle of patient access to online health records but had mixed feelings regarding the potential benefits and drawbacks of applying this in practice. Staff identified opportunities for improving patient engagement, health literacy, and efficiencies in some administrative workloads, as well as concerns about maintaining the clinical integrity of patient records and ensuring that staff and patient safety and wellbeing are protected.ConclusionParticipants acknowledged that ORA may transform the purpose and function of the record and that ORA has potential to instigate a significant cultural shift in primary care, changing how staff work and relate to patients. This underlines the need for additional staff training and support to expand capability and capacity to adapt practice and enhance patient engagement with, and understanding of, their health records.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference35 articles.

1. Impact of providing patients access to electronic health records on quality and safety of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2. Adult patient access to electronic health records;Ammenwerth;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021

3. Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review;Tapuria;Informatics Heal Soc Care,2021

4. Government HM (2014) National Information Board. Personalised health and care 2020 (HM Government, Leeds).

5. NHS England (2019) The NHS long term plan, https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/nhs-long-term-plan-version-1.2.pdf (accessed 5 Apr 2023).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3