Crossing and dismantling boundaries: recognising the value of professional staff within higher education

Author:

Vere Kelly1ORCID,Verney Charlotte2ORCID,Webster-Deakin Tara3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UK Institute for Technical Skills and Strategy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

2. Education and Student Success, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

3. School of Cultures, Languages and Area Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Abstract

In this article, we use the concept of the third space to explore how professional staff within UK universities experience boundaries. We focus on professional staff working in three areas of higher education that have been conceptualised differently as third spaces to date: widening participation, technical staff and academic administration. We draw on empirical research from three distinct, but related, qualitative research projects that explored contemporary issues, institutional change, professional identities, relationships and expertise within these under-researched professional contexts. We show how boundaries are experienced, crossed and sometimes dismantled. We highlight where increased collaboration has a positive effect on achieving institutional goals through improved relationships between academic and professional staff, and the recognition of diverse forms of knowledge within the university workforce. We argue for a conception of the third space that is not a discrete or distinct space, which professionals work within or outside of, but instead conceived of as a way of working, which all higher education professionals may engage in, to greater or lesser extents. Doing so provides new insights into the existence of third space working among new professional groups and highlights the potential for all professional staff to engage in third space working to the benefit of their institutions.

Publisher

UCL Press

Reference77 articles.

1. ‘Close encounters of the third kind’;Akerman K McIntosh E Nutt D,2022

2. ARC (Academic Registrars’ Council) ‘Practitioner groups’ 2024 Accessed 10 January 2024. https://arc.ac.uk/practitioner-groups

3. ‘Do non-academic professionals enhance universities’ performance? Reputation vs. organisation’;Baltaru R.D;Studies in Higher Education,2019

4. ‘In the backrooms of science: The work of technicians in science labs’;Barley S.R Bechky B.A;Work and Occupations,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3