Affiliation:
1. Workers’ Educational Association, UK
Abstract
This article critically analyses national and institutional forms of policy and different conceptions of widening participation in higher education in England by contrasting representations of ‘it’ as a ‘problem’ to be managed, compared with complex and recurring dilemmas in practice. Building on Bacchi’s (2012a) strategy, the article asks, ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’ (WPR), and how the ‘problem’ of widening participation was constructed in specific contexts, by examining tensions between constructions of policy in texts and representations of widening participation in semi-structured interviews with national and institutional policy actors. Policy actors did not share a single voice, and various proposals embodied different representations of the ‘problem’. These do not reduce practice to distinct or static categories limited by available policy options. Instead, contemporary representations, interpretations and translations of policy and practice make visible both limitations and possibilities for widening participation in higher education in the future.
Reference38 articles.
1. Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us?;C Bacchi;Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,2000
2. Introducing the “What’s the Problem Represented to be?” approach;C Bacchi,2012a
3. Why study problematizations? Making politics visible;C Bacchi;Open Journal of Political Science,2012b
4. Drug problematizations and politics: Deploying a poststructural analytic strategy;C Bacchi;Contemporary Drug Problems,2018
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献