Affiliation:
1. Politecnico di Torino, Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST)
Abstract
The concept of sustainable development is closely related to that of sustainability assessment, as it implies a process of evaluation of progress made over time. In this context, indicators present themselves as a key and fundamental element for measuring and evaluating the specific issues that compose the different phenomena to be monitored. Indeed, they constitute the tool that can provide qualitative or quantitative data and information needed to identify the performance, progress, and weaknesses of plans, projects, and policies. In this context, the paper investigates the potential differences that the indicator can take in the differing purposes of measurement and evaluation in the context of urban sustainable development. A literature review is therefore conducted to gather and systematize knowledge so that it can be useful for reflections on sustainable urban assessment. The paper reports the results of the analysis concerning the context of measurement and evaluation, highlighting the differences or similarities from a conceptual and operational point of view.
Publisher
SIEV - Societa Italiana di Estimo e Valutazione
Subject
Decision Sciences (miscellaneous),Law,Strategy and Management,Finance
Reference87 articles.
1. ABASTANTE F., GABALLO M., “How to Assess Walkability as a Measure of Pedestrian Use: First Step of a Multi- methodological Approach”, in Bevilacqua C., Calabrò F., Della Spina L. (eds.), New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 178, Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 254-263. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-030-48279-4_24.
2. ABASTANTE F., LAMI I.M., MECCA B., How Covid-19 influences the 2030 Agenda: do the practices of achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 11 need rethinking and adjustment?, Valori e Valutazioni, Vol. 26, 2020a, pp. 11-23. https://doi .org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20202603.
3. ABASTANTE F., CORRENTE S., LAMI I.L., GRECO S., MECCA, B., The introduction of the SRF-II method to compare hypothesis of adaptive reuse for an iconic historical building, Operational Research, Vol. 22, 2020b, pp. 2397-2436.
4. ADB AND UN ENVIRONMENT, Strengthening the environmental dimensions of the sustainable development goals in Asia and the pacific: tool compendium, 2019 (downloadable from the website: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publicati on/481446/environmental-dimensions-sdgs-tool-compen dium.pdf consulted online on December 9th 2022).
5. ALWAER H., KIRK D., Building sustainability assessment methods, Engineering Sustainability, Vol. 165, No. ES4, 2012.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献