Affiliation:
1. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
2. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Universidad Espíritu Santo. ESAI Business School, Ecuador
3. Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Abstract
In a context marked by the emergence of new platforms and interfaces, digital native media face the challenge of organizing and presenting their content in an effective and eloquent way. This milestone requires ongoing work toward the identification and conceptualization of the dimensions that map the structural and formal requirements necessary for fluid communication with audiences and adequate visibility in the digital ecosystem. This study, which adopts a quantitative–qualitative methodological design, proposes, describes, and applies a taxonomy for the analysis of digital media web interfaces. Based on a review of the literature, two rounds of expert judgment, and a pilot test, the research identifies 14 thematic dimensions, 36 indicators, and 69 variables. The study focuses on the importance of renewing research about taxonomy related to structural dimensions that address narrative, quality, usability, information search, and content redissemination and socialization, among other aspects. The study of web interfaces applied to journalism demands long-term research work with a holistic approach that, at a conceptual and practical level, can offer proposals for analysis and diagnosis on the basis of an integrated method.
Publisher
Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems,General Medicine
Reference48 articles.
1. Al-Said, Nidal; Al-Said, Khaleel M. (2022). “The effect of visual and informational complexity of news website designs on comprehension and memorization among undergraduate students”. AI & society, v. 37, pp. 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01164-6
2. Bravo-Araujo, Andrea; Serrano-Puche, Javier; Novoa-Jaso, María-Fernanda (2021). “Uso del clickbait en los medios nativos digitales españoles. Un análisis de El Confidencial, El Español, Eldiario.es y Ok Diario”. Dígitos. Revista de comunicación digital, n. 7, pp. 185-210. https://doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i7.184
3. Cabero-Almenara, Julio; Barroso-Osuna, Julio (2013). “La utilización del juicio de experto para la evaluación de TIC: el coeficiente de competencia experta”. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía, v. 65, n. 2, pp. 25-38. https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202
4. Cabero-Almenara, Julio, Llorente-Cejudo, María-del-Carmen (2013). “La aplicación del juicio de experto como técnica de evaluación de las tecnologías de la información (TIC)”. Eduweb. Revista de tecnología de información comunicación en educación, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 11-22. https://revistaeduweb.org/index.php/eduweb/article/view/206
5. Cabrera-Méndez, Marga; Codina, Lluís; Salaverría, Ramón (2019). “Qué son y qué no son los nuevos medios. 70 visiones de expertos hispanos”. Revista latina de comunicación social, n. 74, pp. 1506-1520. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2019-1396
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献