Affiliation:
1. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, SPAIN
2. Department of Communication Sciences and Sociology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, SPAIN
3. ESAI Business School, Espiritu Santo University, Guayaquil, ECUADOR
4. Universidad Europea del Atlantico, Santander, SPAIN
Abstract
The current media ecosystem, marked by immediacy and social networks dynamics, has created a fertile field for disinformation. Faced with its exponential growth, since 2014, research has focused on combating false content in the media. From a descriptive approach, this study has analyzed 200 documents on fact-checking and fake news published between 2014 and 2022 in scientific journals indexed in Scopus. This study has found that Europe and the United States are leading the way in the number of journals and authors publishing on the subject. The United States universities are the ones that host the most significant number of authors working on fact-checking, while the methodologies used, mostly <i>ad hoc</i> due to the novelty of the topic, allow to reflect on the need to promote work focused on the design, testing, and evaluation of prototypes or real experiences within the field. The most common contributions analyzed include typologies of false content and media manipulation mechanisms, models for evaluating and detecting disinformation, proposals to combat false content and strengthen verification mechanisms, studies on the role of social media in the spread of disinformation, efforts to develop media literacy among the public and journalists, case studies of fact-checkers, identification of factors that influence the belief in fake news, and analysis of the relationship between disinformation, verification, politics, and democracy. It is concluded that it is essential to develop research that connects the academy with the industry to raise awareness of the need to address these issues among the different actors in the media scenario.
Reference114 articles.
1. Addy, J. M. (2020). The art of the real: Fact checking as information literacy instruction. Reference Services Review, 48(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2019-0067
2. Ahmed, K. A. (2018). In Bangladesh: Direct control of media trumps fake news. Journal of Asian Studies, 77(4), pp. 909-922. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911818002516
3. Aird, M. J., Ecker, U. K. H., Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2018). Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample. Royal Society Open Science, 5(12), e180593. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180593
4. Alba-Juez, L., & Mackenzie, J. L. (2019). Emotion, lies, and “bullshit” in journalistic discourse: The case of fake news. Iberica, 38, 17-50.
5. Amorós Garcia, M. (2018). Fake news: La verdad de las noticias falsas [Fake news: The truth about fake news]. Plataforma Editorial.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献