Resectability of Small Duodenal Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Cold Snare Polypectomy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) are novel endoscopic procedures for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). However, consensus on how to use both procedures appropriately has not been established. In this study, we evaluated treatment outcomes of both procedures, including resectability. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled study conducted between January 2020 and June 2022, patients with SNADETs ≤ 12 mm were randomly allocated to UEMR and CSP groups. The primary endpoint was sufficient vertical R0 resection (SVR0) which was defined as R0 resection including a sufficient submucosal layer. We compared treatment outcomes including SVR0 rate between groups. RESULTS: The SVR0 rate was significantly higher in the UEMR group than in the CSP group (65.6% vs. 41.5%, P = 0.01). By contrast, the R0 resection rate was not significantly different between study groups (70.3% vs. 61.5%, P = 0.29). The submucosal layer thickness was significantly greater in the UEMR group than in the CSP group (median 546 [range, 309-833] µm vs. 69 [0-295] µm, P < 0.01). CSP had a shorter total procedure time (median 12 [range, 8-16] min vs. 1 [1-3] min, P < 0.01) and fewer total bleeding events (9.4% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: UEMR has superior vertical resectability compared to CSP, but CSP has a shorter procedure time and fewer bleeding events. Although CSP is preferable for most small SNADETs, UEMR should be selected for lesions that cannot be definitively diagnosed as mucosal low-grade neoplasias.