Reliability of Two Visual–Perceptual Tests for Children With Cerebral Palsy

Author:

Tsai Li-ting1,Lin Keh-chung2,Liao Hua-fang3,Hsieh Ching-lin4

Affiliation:

1. Li-ting Tsai, MS, is PhD Student, Taipei Parents’ Association for the Visually Impaired, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei

2. Keh-chung Lin, ScD, is Associate Professor and Chair, School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei

3. Hua-fang Liao, MS, is Associate Professor, School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei

4. Ching-lin Hsieh, PhD, is Professor, School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, 4F, No 17, Shiujou Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan; clhsieh@ntu.edu.tw

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE. We examined the reliability of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test–Revised (MVPT–R) and the Test of Visual–Perceptual Skills–Revised (TVPS–R) in 52 children with cerebral palsy. METHOD. The MVPT–R and TVPS–R were initially assessed by a single rater and then randomly assigned to the same rater or another rater after 6 to 14 days. RESULTS. For scale-level reliability of both tests, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were high. The smallest real differences (SRDs) were largely acceptable. The ICCs of most subscale-level reliability of the TVPS–R were satisfactory. The SRD of each TVPS–R subscale score was notable (>29%). The internal consistency was high for both tests. CONCLUSION. The scale-level reliabilities of both tests were satisfactory in children with cerebral palsy. Although most subscales of the TVPS–R had acceptable test–retest or interrater agreement, all subscales of the TVPS–R had large SRDs, limiting their clinical utility.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3