Occupational Therapy Benchmarks Within Orthopedic (Hip) Critical Pathways

Author:

Novalis Sharon D.1,Messenger Michele Fricke2,Morris Lee3

Affiliation:

1. Sharon D. Novalis, MSOT, OTR/L, is Doctoral Student and Research Associate, University of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 5012 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260

2. Michele Fricke Messenger, MSOT, OTR/L, is Staff Therapist, HCR Manor Care, Towson, Maryland

3. Lee Morris, MSOT, OTR/L, is Director of Occupational Therapy, Hill Park Health Care Center, Syracuse, New York

Abstract

Abstract Objective. This study examined patient performance benchmarks for occupational therapy within orthopedic (hip) critical pathways. Method. Eight orthopedic (hip) critical pathways gathered from occupational therapy practitioners working in hospital and rehabilitation settings were examined to determine commonalities and differences of occupational therapy benchmarks, disciplines involved, and identified allowable variances. A comparison and contrast matrix was developed to provide a visual means of reviewing the data. Results. Nursing, physical therapy, and occupational therapy were disciplines consistently involved in the pathways. Activities of daily living related to self-care were the most consistently used occupational therapy benchmark within the sample pathways, and functional transfers were the second most-used benchmark. The remaining occupational therapy benchmarks varied, and little commonality was found in their use. Frequency of use also varied among the eight pathways. Five of eight pathways specifically coded variances, with the remaining three providing space for explanation of the variance. Conclusion. Although these eight orthopedic (hip) critical pathways included occupational therapy benchmarks, further development and definition of the role of occupational therapy within subsequent orthopedic (hip) critical pathways is needed.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3