Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study

Author:

Baker Paul12ORCID,Coole Carol3ORCID,Drummond Avril3ORCID,Khan Sayeed4ORCID,McDaid Catriona2ORCID,Hewitt Catherine2ORCID,Kottam Lucksy1ORCID,Ronaldson Sarah2ORCID,Coleman Elizabeth2ORCID,McDonald David A56ORCID,Nouri Fiona3ORCID,Narayanasamy Melanie3ORCID,McNamara Iain7ORCID,Fitch Judith8ORCID,Thomson Louise3ORCID,Richardson Gerry9ORCID,Rangan Amar121011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK

2. York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

3. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

4. Make UK, The Manufacturers’ Organisation, London, UK

5. Whole System Patient Flow Programme, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK

6. Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

7. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK

8. British Orthopaedic Association Patient Liaison Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK

9. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK

10. Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

11. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Background Hip and knee replacements are regularly carried out for patients who work. There is little evidence about these patients’ needs and the factors influencing their return to work. There is a paucity of guidance to help patients return to work after surgery and a need for structured occupational advice to enable them to return to work safely and effectively. Objectives To develop an occupational advice intervention to support early recovery to usual activities including work that is tailored to the requirements of patients undergoing hip or knee replacements. To test the acceptability, practicality and feasibility of this intervention within current care frameworks. Design An intervention mapping approach was used to develop the intervention. The research methods employed were rapid evidence synthesis, qualitative interviews with patients and stakeholders, a prospective cohort study, a survey of clinical practice and a modified Delphi consensus process. The developed intervention was implemented and assessed during the final feasibility stage of the intervention mapping process. Setting Orthopaedic departments in NHS secondary care. Participants Patients who were in work and intending to return to work following primary elective hip or knee replacement surgery, health-care professionals and employers. Interventions Occupational advice intervention. Main outcome measures Development of an occupational advice intervention, fidelity of the developed intervention when delivered in a clinical setting, patient and clinician perspectives of the intervention and preliminary assessments of intervention effectiveness and cost. Results A cohort study (154 patients), 110 stakeholder interviews, a survey of practice (152 respondents) and evidence synthesis provided the necessary information to develop the intervention. The intervention included information resources, a personalised return-to-work plan and co-ordination from the health-care team to support the delivery of 13 patient and 20 staff performance objectives. To support delivery, a range of tools (e.g. occupational checklists, patient workbooks and employer information), roles (e.g. return-to-work co-ordinator) and training resources were created. Feasibility was assessed for 21 of the 26 patients recruited from three NHS trusts. Adherence to the defined performance objectives was 75% for patient performance objectives and 74% for staff performance objectives. The intervention was generally well received, although the short time frame available for implementation and concurrent research evaluation led to some confusion among patients and those delivering the intervention regarding its purpose and the roles and responsibilities of key staff. Limitations Implementation and uptake of the intervention was not standardised and was limited by the study time frame. Evaluation of the intervention involved a small number of patients, which limited the ability to assess it. Conclusions The developed occupational advice intervention supports best practice. Evaluation demonstrated good rates of adherence against defined performance objectives. However, a number of operational and implementation issues require further attention. Future work The intervention warrants a randomised controlled trial to assess its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to improve rates and timing of sustained return to work after surgery. This research should include the development of a robust implementation strategy to ensure that adoption is sustained. Study registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN27426982 and PROSPERO CRD42016045235. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 45. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health Research

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3