MIXED METHODS APPRAISAL TOOL: STRENGTHENING THE METHODOLOGICAL RIGOR OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH STUDIES IN NURSING

Author:

Oliveira João Lucas Campos de1ORCID,Magalhães Ana Maria Müller de1ORCID,Matsuda Laura Misue2ORCID,Santos José Luís Guedes dos3ORCID,Souto Rafaella Queiroga4ORCID,Riboldi Caren de Oliveira5ORCID,Ross Ratchneewan6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

2. Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Brasil

3. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brasil

4. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brasil

5. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brasil

6. University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Estados Unidos

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the use of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise and to strengthen the methodological rigor of mixed methods studies in nursing. Method: a theoretical essay was used to describe the application of Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to support the development and assessment of mixed methods research in nursing. Four mixed methods articles in nursing were purposely chosen and evaluated based on the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool criteria. Results: Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool is a tool for evaluating primary mixed methods studies based on five evaluation criteria: 1) justification for adopting mixed methods methodology; 2) integration between the quantitative and qualitative components; 3) interpretation of integrated findings of quantitative and qualitative data; 4) presentation of divergences between quantitative and qualitative results; and 5) compliance with the methodological rigor of each individual approach in mixed methods research. Conclusion: Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool is an instrumental resource that can be used to appraise mixed methods research and strengthen the methodological rigor in planning and conducting future mixed studies in nursing research.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference29 articles.

1. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals,2019

2. Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research - Equator Network,2020

3. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials;Schulz KF;Ann Intern Med,2010

4. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies;Von Elm E;Lancet,2007

5. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement;Moher D;Int J Surg,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3