Diagnostic overshadowing of mental health conditions in UK health care

Author:

Hale Zoe Jane

Abstract

Purpose Diagnostic overshadowing (DO) may be contributing to the worsening physical health outcomes for people diagnosed with mental health (MH) conditions. DO is a phenomenon researched worldwide, but there has been no systematic review of the evidence for its prevalence in UK health care. This paper aims to add to this body of knowledge, expanding the understanding of what factors are contributing to the poor physical well-being of people with diagnosed MH conditions. Design/methodology/approach A systematic search of three databases was conducted and after evaluation, three studies were selected for the review. Findings DO was found to have a high prevalence with structural, staffing and patient issues identified through a thematic analysis. Contemporary evidence shows themes identified are still impacting UK health care. Collaborative working across mental and physical health teams, thorough and lengthy assessments, and improved education for physical health care staff have been cited as mitigating factors to this practice. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first review of the evidence for diagnostic overshadowing taking place in UK health care.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference45 articles.

1. Prescribing stigma in mental disorders: a comparative study of Portuguese psychiatrists and general practitioners;International Journal of Social Psychiatry,2021

2. Exploring the facilitators, barriers, and strategies for self-management in adults living with severe mental illness, with and without long-term conditions: a qualitative evidence synthesis;Plos One,2021

3. Survey of psychiatric assessment rooms in UK emergency departments;BJPsych Bulletin,2016

4. British Medical Association (2019), “Consent and refusal by adults with decision-making capacity: a toolkit for doctors”, available at: www.bma.org.uk/media/2481/bma-consent-toolkit-september-2019.pdf (accessed 26 October 2023).

5. Mixed methods appraisal tool: strengthening the methodological rigour of mixed methods research studies in nursing;Texto & Contexto, Enfermagem,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3