GROUNDED THEORY: USE IN SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN BRAZILIAN NURSING JOURNALS WITH QUALIS A CLASSIFICATION

Author:

Peiter Caroline Cechinel1ORCID,Santos José Luís Guedes dos1ORCID,Kahl Carolina1ORCID,Copelli Fernanda Hannah da Silva1ORCID,Cunha Kamylla Santos da1ORCID,Lacerda Maria Ribeiro2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brasil

2. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brasil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the use of Grounded Theory as a methodological framework in scientific articles published in Brazilian Nursing journals with Qualis Capes A1 and A2. Method: descriptive, documentary study with a quantitative approach. Five Brazilian nursing journals with Qualis A1 and A2 in the 2016 assessment were used as sources. Data were collected on the website of each journal through the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), by consulting the numbers published in the 2013-2016 quadrennium. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 49 articles were selected, most of them published by the Texto & Contexto Enfermagem journal (34.6%). Regarding the methodological aspect, the use of the Straussian perspective predominated (79,6). Regarding the methodological characteristics, most articles used theoretical sampling (63.3%), theoretical saturation (53.1%), comparative analysis (69.4%), and presented the development of a theoretical model or central category in the results (75.6%). However, only seven (14.3%) studies specified the use of memos, 22 (44.9%) mentioned the use of diagrams and 16 (32.7%) described the theory validation step. Conclusion: the need for consensus among Brazilian nursing researchers on the methodological characteristics to be described in studies using the Grounded Theory is highlighted.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference32 articles.

1. Grounded Theory: adaptações ao contexto da deficiência e educação;Camalhão MI;Indagatio Didactica,2014

2. Methodological perspectives in the use of grounded theory in nursing and health research;Santos JLG;Esc Anna Nery,2016

3. The construction process of grounded theory in administration: El proceso de construcción de la grounded theory en administración;Roman DJ;Contaduría y Administración,2017

4. Contrasting Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist Grounded Theory: Methodological and Philosophical Conflicts;Kenny M;Philosophical Conflicts. TQR,2015

5. Grounded theory in nursing: an integrative review;Gomes IM;J Nurs UFPE on line,2015

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3