Methodological path to reach the degree of saturation in qualitative research: grounded theory

Author:

Moura Cleson Oliveira de1ORCID,Silva Ítalo Rodolfo1ORCID,Silva Thiago Privado da1ORCID,Santos Karoliny Alves1ORCID,Crespo Maria da Conceição Albernaz1ORCID,Silva Marcelle Miranda da1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: to achieve the degree of saturation in study that applied the grounded theory. Methods: qualitative research, carried out in four Family Health Units, between June 2018 and May 2019. The data from the interviews with 30 health professionals and non-participant observation were coded in the stages: open, axial and integration. Results: the degree of saturation was achieved by two conceptual models - theoretical saturation and inductive thematic. Theoretical saturation was considered: the development of conceptual codes and observation, in the collection and analysis of data, when they generated new categories/subcategories or only indicated increasing instances. For thematic inductive saturation, the use of new codes based on each interview stood out. Final Considerations: the visual layout for the number of codes, the theoretical scope of the concepts and the delimitation of the sample groups guided the identification of the degree of saturation for the development of the conceptual body that supported the substantive theory.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference17 articles.

1. Grounded theory in nursing: integrative review;Gomes IM;Rev Enferm UFPE,2015

2. metodologia da pesquisa e de teoria fundamentada nos dados;Tarozzi M,2011

3. SAGE;Corbin J,2015

4. Methodological perspectives in the use of grounded theory in nursing and health research;Santos JLG;Esc Anna Nery,2016

5. The construction process of grounded theory in administration: El proceso de construcción de la grounded theory en administración;Roman DJ;Contaduria Adm,2017

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3