Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil
2. Radboud University, Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, an increasing number of studies adopting the experimental method have appeared in Public Administration journals. It has been argued that the advantage of experiments in behavioral sciences is that researchers can control contextual factors while investigating the effect of manipulations on a variable of interest. Another point is that experiments can be replicated and, thus, increase confidence in research results. However, replications are rarely undertaken, especially in the behavioral sciences. This article examines the results of the “Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology,” which replicated 100 experiments previously published in leading Psychology journals. Based on the findings of this project, we present seven recommendations to Public Administration scholars that can improve the quality of their experiments.
Reference60 articles.
1. APA Dictionary of Psychology
2. Remove, rather than redefine, statistical significance (corresondence);Armhein V.;Nature Human Behaviour,2018
3. Psychology’s reroducibility roblem is exaggerated — say sychologists. Nature News;Baker M,2016
4. Field exeriments across the social sciences;Baldassarri D;Annual Review of Sociology,2017
5. Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US rograms;Banerjeea A;Energy Policy,2003
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献