Critical thinking and accuracy of nurses' diagnoses. Part I: risk of low accuracy diagnoses and new views of critical thinking

Author:

Lunney Margaret1

Affiliation:

1. The City University of New York

Abstract

Interpretations of patient data are complex and diverse, contributing to a risk of low accuracy nursing diagnoses. This risk is confirmed in research findings that accuracy of nurses' diagnoses varied widely from high to low. Highly accurate diagnoses are essential, however, to guide nursing interventions for the achievement of positive health outcomes. Development of critical thinking abilities is likely to improve accuracy of nurses' diagnoses. Newer views of critical thinking serve as a basis for critical thinking in nursing. Seven cognitive skills and ten habits of mind are identified as dimensions of critical thinking for use in the diagnostic process.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference18 articles.

1. ICNP Beta 2, International Classification of Nursing Practice,2002

2. Where are we now?: Accuracy of nurses'diagnoses: foundation of NANDA, NIC and NOC;Lunney M;Nurs Diagn,1998

3. Critical thinking and nursing diagnosis: case studies and analyses;Lunney M,2001

4. NCVHS to extol a standard vocab: HHS Committee completing its work culling alphabet soup of terms;Gillespie G

5. The computer-based patient record. an essential technology for health care, Revised,1997

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Intensive Care Pressure Injuries: A Cohort Study Using the CALCULATE and Braden Scales;Advances in Skin & Wound Care;2022-03

2. Identifying Nursing Diagnosis Patterns in Three Intensive Care Units Using Network Analysis;International Journal of Nursing Knowledge;2018-10-14

3. Respiratory status of adult patients in the postoperative period of thoracic or upper abdominal surgeries;Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem;2017-12-04

4. Patients' Care Needs: Documentation Analysis in General Hospitals;International Journal of Nursing Knowledge;2014-10-31

5. The Omaha System: a systematic review of the recent literature;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association;2014-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3