Affiliation:
1. Fundação Hermínio Ometto, Brasil
2. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil
3. Fundação Hermínio Ometto, Brasil; Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil
Abstract
Abstract Introduction In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for esthetic treatments, especially among orthodontic patients. Objective This study determined the fracture strength of monocrystalline and polycrystalline ceramic brackets of different manufacturers during archwire torque. Material and method Sixty ceramic brackets (Roth, right upper central incisors, 0.022 x 0.028-inch slot) were allocated into two groups (30 specimens per group) according to the type of ceramics: monocrystalline and polycrystalline. Subsequently, the groups were divided into three subgroups (n = 10) according to the manufacturer: Orthometric, Eurodonto and Ortho Technology. Sixty PVC cylinders were filled with chemically activated acrylic resin (CAAR), the brackets were fixed with CAAR onto the cylinder surface and the excess material was used to partially cover the base of the bracket. After 24h, the U-shaped wire base (0.019 x 0.025 inches; 6 mm height and width) was inserted into the bracket slot and fixed thereon with a stainless-steel wire. Vertical folds were made at the ends of the “U” to support the universal test machine chisel. The fracture strength test was performed at a speed of 1.0 mm/min until fracture into a universal test machine (Instron). The data were recorded, transformed into g.mm and submitted to two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, version 9.3) (α=5%). Result Monocrystalline brackets showed a higher fracture strength than polycrystalline brackets, regardless of the manufacturer (p<0.05). The highest fracture strength values were observed in Ortho Technology and Orthometric brackets, with no significant difference between them (p>0.05). Conclusion Monocrystalline ceramic brackets have a higher fracture strength than polycrystalline brackets, with significant manufacturer-dependent differences.
Reference24 articles.
1. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances;Rosvall MD;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009
2. Adhesion and orthodontic plastic attachments;Newman GV;Am J Orthod,1969
3. Torsional creep of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets;Alkire RG;Dent Mater,1997
4. Microestrutura e propriedades mecânicas de bráquetes cerâmicos;Araújo MD;Journal of Biodentistry and Biomaterials.,2013
5. Physical properties and clinical characteristics of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review;Jena AK;Trends Biomater Artif Organs,2007
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献