Methodological challenges in the use of focus groups with people with severe mental illness

Author:

Onocko-Campos Rosana Teresa1,Díaz Alberto Rodolfo Giovanello2,Dahl Catarina Magalhães3,Leal Erotildes Maria3,Serpa Junior Octavio Domont de3

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil

2. Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina

3. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract: This study addresses the practical, methodological and ethical challenges that were found in three studies that used focus groups with people with severe mental illness, in the context of community mental health services in Brazil. Focus groups are a powerful tool in health research that need to be better discussed in research with people with severe mental illness, in the context of community mental health facilities. This study is based on the authors’ experience of conducting and analyzing focus groups in three different cities - Campinas, Rio de Janeiro and Salvador - between 2006-2010. The implementation of focus groups with people with severe mental illness is discussed in the following categories; planning, group design, sampling, recruitment, group interview guides, and conduction. The importance of connecting mental healthcare providers as part of the research context is emphasized. Ethical issues and challenges are highlighted, as well as the establishment of a sensitive and empathic group atmosphere, wherein mutual respect can facilitate interpersonal relations and enable people diagnosed with severe mental illness to make sense of the experience. We emphasize the relevance of the interaction between clinical and research teams in order to create collaborative work, achieve inquiry aims, and elicit narratives of mental health users and professionals.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference69 articles.

1. Illness narratives fact or fiction?;Bury M;Sociol Health Illn,2001

2. Medicine, rationality and experience;Good B,1994

3. Culture, illness, and care clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research;Kleinman A;Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ),2006

4. The illness experience: state of knowledge and perspectives for research;Pierret J;Sociol Health Illn,2003

5. Projeto de pesquisa. Métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto;Creswell JW,2010

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3