Users remain overlooked: Shared decision‐making processes for people with anxiety disorders

Author:

Villena Amelia12ORCID,Hurtado María M.123ORCID,Gómez Clara4ORCID,Amor Gisela1ORCID,Vega Amanda1ORCID,Morales‐Asencio José Miguel123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mental Health Unit Regional University Hospital of Málaga Málaga Spain

2. Faculty of Health Sciences Universidad de Málaga Málaga Spain

3. Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA) Universidad de Málaga Málaga Spain

4. Badalona Care Services Barcelona Spain

Abstract

Accessible SummaryWhat Is Known on the Subject? Patients do not always receive enough information about their diagnosis and their perceived participation in decision‐making about their treatment is low. Some participants reported feeling very uncertain when the physician invited them to choose between these options. Others users expressed their satisfaction with the trend away from paternalistic attitudes in the health system. There is a trend towards pharmacological prescription as a first approximation. This contrasts with the recommendations of scientific organizations based on evidence and cost‐effectiveness studies on the offer of psychological interventions as the first option. The user groups pointed out that active coping, based on exposure to anxiety‐generating situations, made a significant contribution to alleviating their anxiety disorders. However, some of those interviewed rejected this type of intervention. What the Paper Adds to Existing Knowledge? Users diagnosed with anxiety disorders miss more information about the disorder and participation in its treatment. Opposite positions coexist in terms of participation in the choice of treatment. Pharmacological treatment is most commonly the first option offered. What Are the Implications for Practice? This study is an example in itself of the involvement of users in the healthcare process, and therefore placing them at the centre of attention, as reflected in healthcare policies and clinical practice guidelines. It promotes the identification of needs that users diagnosed of anxiety disorders may have, with the aim of putting in place, from healthcare professionals and health services, the necessary supports adapted to these. Mental health nurses are well‐positioned to offer support and guidance during the process of involvement and shared decision‐making. AbstractIntroductionAn essential aspect of mental health treatment and recovery is the degree of involvement by health service users in the process.Aim/QuestionExplore the values, demands and preferences of persons diagnosed with anxiety disorders, their participation in the treatment provided, and the response of the health system in this regard.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted, with 51 participants. Nine focus groups and four in‐depth interviews took place.ResultsThree broad categories were identified: (1) diagnosis; (2) treatment options offered and shared decision‐making; and (3) coping with the disorder. Sometimes patients do not receive enough information to cover their needs. A trend towards drug prescription as a first approach was observed, while active coping based on exposure to anxiogenic situations was indicated as the most effective option.ConclusionShared decision‐making is a necessary aspect of treatment, and the therapeutic process should be adapted to match the service user's preferences, values and needs.Implications for the PracticeThis research identifies the needs of patients diagnosed with anxiety disorders and promotes, therefore, from healthcare professionals and services, the provision of measures to meet these needs.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3