Pain in emergency units: correlation with risk classification categories

Author:

Viveiros Wandressa Letícia1,Okuno Meiry Fernanda Pinto1,Campanharo Cássia Regina Vancini1ORCID,Lopes Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira1,Oliveira Gabriella Novelli2,Batista Ruth Ester Assayag1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil

2. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: to correlate risk classification categories with the level of pain of patients in an emergency service. Method: cross-sectional study carried out in the Risk Classification of 611 patients. The variables studied were: age, gender, comorbidities, complaint duration, medical specialty, signs and symptoms, outcome, color attributed in the risk classification of and degree of pain. We used Analysis of Variance, a Chi-Square test and a Likelihood Ratio test. Results: the average age was 42.1 years (17.8); 59.9% were women; the green (58.9%) and yellow (22.7%) risk classification prevailed and hypertension (18.3%) was the most common Comorbidity. The most frequent pain intensity was moderate (25.9%). In the red category, patients presented a higher percentage of absence of pain; in the blue, mild pain; and in the green, yellow and orange categories, there was a greater percentage of intense pain (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: among the patients who presented pain, the majority reported moderate intensity. Regarding risk categories, most patients in the red category did not report pain. Those who were classified as green, yellow and orange, reported mostly intense pain. On the other hand, patients in the blue category reported predominantly mild pain.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference26 articles.

1. Emergency department overcrowding: evidence-based answers to frequently asked questions;Saway R;Rev Med Clin Condes,2017

2. Relationship between physical function and decision-making capacity in oldest-old;Mirandola AR;Pajar,2015

3. Relationship between complaints presented by emergency patients and the final outcome;Guedes HM;Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem,2015

4. Scientific literature on the reliability and validity of the manchester triage system (MTS) protocol: A integrative literature review;Souza CC;Rev Esc Enferm USP,2015

5. Assessment and risk classification protocol for patients in emergency units;Silva MFN;Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem,2014

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3