Evaluation of percutaneous renal biopsy complications based on outcomes and indicators of the Nursing Outcomes Classification

Author:

Oliveira Magáli Costa1ORCID,Flores Fernanda Da Silva1ORCID,Barbosa Franciele Moreira1ORCID,Fujii Cinthia Dalasta Caetano2ORCID,Rabelo-Silva Eneida Rejane1ORCID,Lucena Amália de Fátima1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

2. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Objective: to evaluate the complications of percutaneous renal biopsy based on outcomes and clinical indicators of the Nursing Outcomes Classification. Method: a prospective longitudinal study. The sample consisted of 13 patients submitted to percutaneous renal biopsy, with 65 evaluations. The patients were evaluated in five moments in the 24 hours after the procedure, using an instrument developed by the researchers based on five outcomes (Blood coagulation, Circulation status, Blood loss severity, Pain level, Comfort status: Physical) and 11 indicators. The Generalized Estimation Equation Test was used to compare the scores of the indicators. The project was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Results: in the 65 evaluations, a statistically significant difference was identified in the reduction of the scores of the following nursing outcomes: Blood coagulation, “hematuria” indicator; Circulation status, in the “systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure” indicators and Comfort status: physical, in the “physical well-being” indicator. Conclusion: the evaluated patients did not show major complications. The clinical indicators signaled changes in circulation status, with reduced blood pressure, as well as in blood clotting observed by hematuria, but without hemodynamic instability. The comfort status was affected by the rest time after the procedure.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference33 articles.

1. BMJ Open;Roccatello D,2017

2. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol;Hogan J,2016

3. Am J Med Sci;Xu D,2017

4. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC): measurement of health outcomes;Moorhead S,2018

5. Rev Cuid;Rodríguez-Acelas AL,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3