Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brasil
2. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Brasil
3. Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
Abstract
ABSTRACT To identify the time spent with the different construction techniques of timber houses, this study evaluates the execution time of different models available in Brazil. Using face-to-face interviews, semi-structured questionnaires were randomly applied to collect average time according to distinct production methods. The most efficient techniques were: ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘post-and-beam’, and ‘log-home’ using artisanal production; ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘stick framing with masonry’, and ‘post-and-beam’ in semi-industrial process; and, ‘modular for building sites’, ‘modular in cross-laminated timber’ and ‘modular woodframe’ in industrial production. Different industrial developers were not as agile as artisanal competitors due to production obstacles in customized projects. Timber construction offers lower execution time than masonry, representing an agile form to build a versatile sustainable dwelling.
Reference76 articles.
1. Aggregation of factors causing cost overruns and time delays in large public construction projects trends and implications;Adam A;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,2017
2. Construction projects cost overrun: what does the literature tell us?;Aljohani A;International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology,2017
3. Casas instantâneas;Antunes B;Téchne,2003
4. Sustainable housing;Aquise GYN,2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献