Affiliation:
1. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China
Abstract
Abstract How do food delivery platform firms, such as Meituan (operated by Tencent) and Ele.me (owned by Alibaba), manage couriers through service contracting rather than formal employment? How do couriers experience control and autonomy at work? Using observation and interviews, the author finds that a combination of data-driven surveillance systems and customer feedback mechanisms are incentivizing workers’ efforts. Corporate utilization of both manual and emotional labor is critical to realizing profits. Individual freedom is framed in a way that crowdsourced couriers are not required to work a minimum amount of time. Flexibility enabled by the algorithmic management, however, cuts both ways. When there is less demand, the platform corporations automatically reduce their dependence on labor. With variable food orders and piece rates, workers’ minimum earnings are not guaranteed. In the absence of Chinese legal protections over the fast-growing food delivery sector, informal workers are desperately struggling for livelihood.◊
Reference34 articles.
1. “I’m my own boss. . .”: active intermediation and “entrepreneurial” worker agency in the Australian gig-economy;BARRATT Tom;Environment and Planning A (EPA): Economy and Space,2020
2. Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century;BRAVERMAN Harry,1998
3. The politics of production: factory regimes under capitalism and socialism;BURAWOY Michael,1985
4. Manufacturing consent: changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism;BURAWOY Michael,1979
5. Platform workers of the world, unite! The emergence of the Transnational Federation of Couriers;CANT Callum;The South Atlantic Quarterly,2020
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献