Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Brasil
2. Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Brasil
3. Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Brasil
4. Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Brasil; Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Brasil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose to identify, collect and analyze in the scientific literature evidence of the existence of speech therapy protocols for collecting clinical history, according to risk classification, especially for oromyofunctional disorders, in infants and preschoolers. Research Strategy We selected published studies, without temporal delimitation, in the electronic databases LILACS, SciELO and PUBMED; and in the gray literature (Google Academic). Selection criteria available in full in Portuguese and English, which identify speech-language pathology protocols of clinical history applicable to infants (6 to 23 months of age) and preschoolers (24 to 71 months of age). Narrative and literature reviews (integrative, systemic, and scope) were excluded. Results 1371 Brazilian publications were found in the period from 1980 to 2022. Of these, only five publications on speech therapy protocols were identified for collecting previous data from the clinical history of the age group between 6 and 71 months. Only two of these protocols have a risk classification for speech-language disorders, distributed in the areas of language and fluency. The other three are from the Orofacial Motricity (OM) area and do not carry a risk classification for orofacial myofunctional disorder. Conclusion There are few speech therapy protocols for surveying the clinical history of infants and preschoolers, whether or not they contain risk classification, published in open access journals that have a complete validation process.Therefore there is a need for more research and publication of these instruments, including in the area of OM.
Reference26 articles.
1. Reflexões sobre o direito universal à anamnese clínica;Masson A;Rev Dissertar,2018
2. A entrevista inicial na clínica fonoaudiológica;Rego FLC;Rev SymposiuM,2000
3. Queixa, demanda e desejo na clínica fonoaudiológica: um estudo de caso clínico;Leto V;Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol,2007
4. Testes de rastreamento x testes de diagnóstico: atualidades no contexto da atuação fonoaudiológica;Goulart BN;Pro-Fono.,2007
5. Construção de um instrumento de triagem do vocabulário para crianças entre 3 e 7 anos;Barbosa ALA;Audiol Commun Res,2019