Agreement on underlying causes of infant death between original records and after investigation: analysis of two biennia in the years 2000

Author:

Santos Hellen Geremias dos1,Andrade Selma Maffei de1,Silva Ana Maria Rigo1,Carvalho Wladithe Organ de1,Mesas Arthur Eumann1,González Alberto Durán1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the agreement between underlying causes of infant deaths obtained from Death Certificates (DC) with those defined after investigation by the Municipal Committee for the Prevention of Maternal and Infant Mortality (CMPMMI), in Londrina, Paraná State, in the biennia 2000-2001 and 2007-2008. Methods: DC of infants and records of investigations were obtained from the CMPMMI. The causes of death registered in both sources were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10), and the underlying causes of deaths were selected. Agreement between underlying causes of deaths was verified by Kappa's (k) test and analyzed according to ICD-10 chapters and blocks of categories in both biennia. Results: In 2000/2001, according to ICD-10 chapters, high agreement rates were observed for conditions originated in the perinatal period (k = 0.85) and for external causes (k = 0.84), while, for congenital malformations, there was a substantial agreement (k = 0.71). In 2007/2008, agreement was considered poor for all analyzed chapters. For blocks of categories, high or substantial agreement rates were observed only in the first biennium for "congenital malformations of the circulatory system" (k = 0.78) and for "other external causes of accidental injury" (k = 0.91). Conclusions: A decrease in agreement between the sources during the study period indicates either an improvement in the process of investigation of infant death by the CMPMMI and/or a worsening in the quality of the DC information.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Epidemiology,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3