Affiliation:
1. State University of Pará, Brazil
Abstract
Background: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated. Aim: To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals Method: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points. Results: The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery.
Reference14 articles.
1. Para uma ética em pesquisa fundada nos direitos humanos;Albuquerque A;Rev. bioét,2013
2. Conflito de interesses em pesquisa clínica;Alves EMO;Acta Cir Bras,2007
3. A Resolução 196/96 e o sistema brasileiro de revisão ética de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos;Barbosa AS;Rev. Bioética.,2011
4. Ethics and clinical research;Beecher HK;N Eng J Med,1996
5. Declaração de Helsinki: relativismo e vulnerabilidade;Diniz D;Cad Saúde Pública,2001
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献