Open Science, open access: literature review of the scientific communication about Covid-19 on the SciELO platform (2020)

Author:

Stueber Ketlen1ORCID,Silveira Filipe Xerxeneski da1ORCID,Teixeira Maria do Rocio Fontoura1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brasil

Abstract

ABSTRACT From the perspective of Open Science by means of open access, the study analyzes the scientific communication about Covid-19, made available by the SciELO platform, until February 19, 2021. With a qualitative approach, content analysis is used for data collection and interpretation. The research is divided into two steps: the first presents the general results on publications, the journals that mostly disseminated the studies, the types of scientific communication used, the citation indexes, and the distribution of articles by thematic areas. The second step shows the aspects listed above and presents a ranking of the 50 most accessed and cited articles. Conclusions show that SciELO made 3,165 publica- tions available, of which 2,042 are scientific articles. The 30 most productive journals are responsible for 43% of the publications. 2,296 documents are from the Health Sciences area and have been identified on 52 different topics related to Covid-19. Among the 42 most accessed and cited studies, three main axes were found: 1) Scientific protagonism: the contribution of science in the fight against Covid-19 - public actions and policies; 2) Protocols and diagnostics for health professionals and spaces; 3) Social, political, and economic issues in the pandemic.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference55 articles.

1. Covid-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE),2020

2. Lockdown ou vigilância participativa em saúde? Lições da Covid-19;Correa Filho HR;Saúde debate,2020

3. Na pandemia da Covid-19, o Brasil enxerga o SUS;Costa AM;Saúde debate,2020

4. Plano Nacional de Enfrentamento à Pandemia da Covid-19: construindo uma autoridade sanitária democrática;Souto LRF;Saúde debate,2020

5. Negacionismo, desdém e mortes: notas sobre a atuação criminosa do governo federal brasileiro no enfrentamento da Covid-19;Giovanella L;Saúde debate,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. EVALUATION OF LEARNING IN HIGH SCHOOL;Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade;2024-02-08

2. Pandemia trouxe oportunidades para mais inclusão na ciência;RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação;2023-08-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3