Comparison of cephalometric measurements from three radiological clinics

Author:

Gonçalves Fernando Antonio,Schiavon Lígia,Pereira Neto João Sarmento,Nouer Darcy Flávio1

Affiliation:

1. State University of Campinas

Abstract

The orthodontic documentation carried out in radiological clinics is essential for diagnosis, planning and control of the orthodontic treatment. Amongst the diagnosis elements used are the cephalometric measurements, and errors can be incorporated as they are obtained. The objective of this work was to evaluate the values of some cephalometric measurements obtained in three radiological clinics using 30 lateral cephalometric radiographs of the head randomly chosen from the archives of the Department of Child Dentistry (Discipline of Orthodontics), School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, UNICAMP. These values were compared with the measurements obtained manually (control group) using variance analysis and Tukey’s and Friedman’s tests. Of the fourteen cephalometric measurements evaluated, the results demonstrated that only four of them presented statistically significant differences: IMPA, 1-NA, FMA, and H-nose. We concluded that although the majority of the mean cephalometric values did not present statistically significant differences, a great variability in the results was found when all the radiographic values were compared. This variability may influence the interpretation of the cephalometric measurements. Hence, we suggest that when the practitioner receives orthodontic documentation, he/she should redo the cephalometric analysis and compare the measurement values found with those presented to him. In addition, the practitioner should be prepared to use other elements for diagnosis, planning and control of the orthodontic treatment.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Reference19 articles.

1. Avaliação do erro de reprodutibilidade dos valores cefalométricos aplicados na filosofia Tweed-Merrifield, pelos métodos computadorizado e convencional;Albuquerque Júnior HR;Ortodontia,1998

2. Estudo comparativo da análise cefalométrica pelo método manual e computadorizado;Brangeli LAM;Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent,2000

3. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer aided digital cephalometry;Chen YJ;Angle Orthod,2000

4. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry;Chen YJ;Angle Orthod,2004

5. Uncertainty in cephalometrics;Cohen AM;Br J Orthod,1984

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3