Author:
Doughty G.F.,Cheung R.,Foad M.A.,Rahman M.,Cameron N.I.,Johnson N.P.,Wang P.D.,Wilkinson C.D.W.
Abstract
AbstractAlthough the directed energy and chemical reactivity of dry etching permits the fabrication of nanostructures with precise geometries, it also causes unwanted electrical and optical changes to the surface, changes generally referred to as “damage”.This paper discusses the extent and the impact of dry-etching damage on rI-V and I[-VI compound semiconductors as assessed by a very wide range of techniques: the performance of devices such as MESFETs, and measurements of other properties - surface uniformly and precisely, Schottky junction characteristics, cut-off of epitaxial wire conductance, integrated photoluminescence, X-ray reflectivity, DLTS, TEM imaging and Raman scattering.We distinguish an important difference between the nature of damage on sidewalls and on surfaces normal to the directed ions, and report on progress towards establishing a model of the nature of dry etching damage. This model is applied to indicate what kinds of processes are likely to give etching with low damage.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference15 articles.
1. 14. Rahman M. , Johnson N.P. , Foad M.A. , Long A. , Holland M.C. , Wilkinson C.D.W. , paper in preparation.
2. Raman Scattering of Reactive-ion Etched GaAs
3. Comparison of damage in the dry etching of GaAs by conventional reactive ion etching and by reactive ion etching with an electron cyclotron resonance generated plasma
4. 1. Cheung R.M.K. , Dry Etched III-V Semiconductors for Nanoelectronics, PhD thesis, Glasgow University, 1990.
5. Reactive ion etching of InP and its optical assessment
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献