Cognitive Distances between Evaluators and Evaluees in Research Evaluation: A Comparison between Three Informetric Methods at the Journal and Subject Category Aggregation Level-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cognitive Distances between Evaluators and Evaluees in Research Evaluation: A Comparison between Three Informetric Methods at the Journal and Subject Category Aggregation Level

Published:2017-08-23 Issue: Volume:2 Page:
ISSN:2504-0537
Container-title:Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
language:
Short-container-title:Front. Res. Metr. Anal.

Author:

Rahman A. I. M. Jakaria,Guns Raf,Rousseau Ronald,Engels Tim C. E.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Reference61 articles.

1. Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics;Abramo;Scientometrics,2011

2. Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university;Aksnes;Res. Eval.,2004

3. Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs;Allen;PLoS ONE,2009

4. Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context?;Bazeley;Higher Educ.,1998

5. The predictive validity of peer review: a selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science;Benda;Int. J. Forecast.,2011

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Excellence or Misconduct: How the Visibility of Team Leaders Impacts the Research Project Competition in the Republic of Moldova?;Science and Innovation;2023-03-18

2. Automotive Head-Up Display Systems: A Bibliometric and Trend Analysis;Cross-Cultural Design;2023

3. Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of China's Smart Grid Research 2008–2018;Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics;2020-10-28

4. Informetrics Research Methods Outlined;Advances in Library and Information Science;2020