The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science

Published:2011-01 Issue:1 Volume:27 Page:166-182
ISSN:0169-2070
Container-title:International Journal of Forecasting
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Forecasting

Author:

Benda Wim G.G.,Engels Tim C.E.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Business and International Management

Reference102 articles.

1. The predictive ability of peer review of grant proposals: the case of ecology and the US National Science Foundation;Abrams;Social Studies of Science,1991

2. Is review by peers as fair as it appears?;Armstrong;Interfaces,1982

3. Research on scientific journals: implications for editors and authors;Armstrong;Journal of Forecasting,1982

4. Management folklore and management science — on portfolio planning, escalation bias, and such;Armstrong;Interfaces,1996

5. Peer review for journals: evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation;Armstrong;Science and Engineering Ethics,1997

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Are reviewer scores consistent with citations?;Scientometrics;2024-07-13

2. A noise audit of the peer review of a scientific article: a WPOM journal case study;WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management;2023-07-17

3. Nanopublication-based semantic publishing and reviewing: a field study with formalization papers;PeerJ Computer Science;2023-02-21

4. The impact of the pitching research framework on AFAANZ grant applications;Pacific-Basin Finance Journal;2023-02

5. Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices;F1000Research;2021-12-24