Explainable AI: roles and stakeholders, desirements and challenges

Author:

Hoffman Robert R.,Mueller Shane T.,Klein Gary,Jalaeian Mohammadreza,Tate Connor

Abstract

IntroductionThe purpose of the Stakeholder Playbook is to enable the developers of explainable AI systems to take into account the different ways in which different stakeholders or role-holders need to “look inside” the AI/XAI systems.MethodWe conducted structured cognitive interviews with senior and mid-career professionals who had direct experience either developing or using AI and/or autonomous systems.ResultsThe results show that role-holders need access to others (e.g., trusted engineers and trusted vendors) for them to be able to develop satisfying mental models of AI systems. They need to know how it fails and misleads as much as they need to know how it works. Some stakeholders need to develop an understanding that enables them to explain the AI to someone else and not just satisfy their own sense-making requirements. Only about half of our interviewees said they always wanted explanations or even needed better explanations than the ones that were provided. Based on our empirical evidence, we created a “Playbook” that lists explanation desires, explanation challenges, and explanation cautions for a variety of stakeholder groups and roles.DiscussionThis and other findings seem surprising, if not paradoxical, but they can be resolved by acknowledging that different role-holders have differing skill sets and have different sense-making desires. Individuals often serve in multiple roles and, therefore, can have different immediate goals. The goal of the Playbook is to help XAI developers by guiding the development process and creating explanations that support the different roles.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Human-Computer Interaction,Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference71 articles.

1. Noise induced hearing loss: Building an application using the ANGELIC methodology;Al-Abdulakarim;Argu. Comput.,2019

2. A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using abstract dialectical frameworks;Al-Abdulkarim;Artif. Intell. Law,2016

3. On the importance of application-grounded experimental design for evaluating explainable ml methods;Amarasinghe;arXiv:,2022

4. Explanatory dialogs with argumentative faculties over inconsistent knowledge bases;Arioua;J. Expert Syst. Applic.,2017

5. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI;Arrieta;Inf. Fusion,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3