Author:
Karka Paraskevi,Johnsson Filip,Papadokonstantakis Stavros
Abstract
Given the importance of climate change it is vital to find a transition away from fossil fuels. The transition will include electrification of several sectors, for example road transport, but considering the strong dependency on carbon-based fuels and associated infrastructures, it is reasonable to assume that biomass-based hydrocarbon will play a key role to smoothen the transition away from fossil fuels. This study provides an analysis of direct and indirect technological options for liquid biofuels based on lignocellulosic resources in the context of greening European fossil-fuel infrastructures. Direct options are those which result in integration of biogenic feedstock in a fossil-based process and then co-processing in a downstream conventional unit or substituting a conventional part of the production chain of a liquid fuel by a bio-based one. Indirect options are those which pave the way for ramping-up biomass supply chain in the form of infrastructure and market. Examples of direct options in the focus of this study are biomass gasification for production of intermediates and biomass pyrolysis substituting fossil feedstock. Examples of indirect options are co-firing biomass in coal-fired power plants and integrating biomass gasification plants with district heating (DH) networks. Such options are important for establishing biomass supply chains and markets. This study also assesses the potential of biomass use in other industrial sectors not directly related with fossil-based fuel or energy production, such as the pulp and paper industry and the iron and steel industry. In this context, opportunities and barriers for both direct and indirect greening options are discussed, focusing mainly on technological and logistic aspects. It is highlighted that fossil-fuel infrastructures can act as drivers for the development of advanced biofuels production as they can reduce the initial risks, in terms of cost and technological maturity, offering the opportunity to increase gradually the demand for biomass, and develop the logistic infrastructure. It is, however, important to make sure that such biofuel production processes are part of a long-term strategy, which needs incentives to overcome current barriers and eventually phase out fossil infrastructures.
Funder
Chalmers Tekniska Högskola
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference119 articles.
1. Key Needs for Development and Potential for Innovations for Highly Efficient and Low Risk Biomass Conversion Technologies, Including Required Financial Instruments
2. Socio-Economic Assessment Total System Costs of RESfuel Scenarios and the Employment Impacts of Biofuel Production
3. Co-processing of standard gas oil and biocrude oil to hydrocarbon fuels;Agblevor;Biomass Bioenergy,2012
4. Economic potential for substitution of fossil fuels with liquefied biomethane in Swedish iron and steel industry – synergy and competition with other sectors;Ahlström;Energy Conver. Manage.,2020
5. Value chains for integrated production of liquefied bio-SNG at sawmill sites – techno-economic and carbon footprint evaluation;Ahlström;Appl. Energy,2017
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献