Author:
Stevenson Robert D.,Suomela Todd,Kim Heejun,He Yurong
Abstract
Data quality (DQ) is a major concern in citizen science (CS) programs and is often raised as an issue among critics of the CS approach. We examined CS programs and reviewed the kinds of data they produce to inform CS communities of strategies of DQ control. From our review of the literature and our experiences with CS, we identified seven primary types of data contributions. Citizens can carry instrument packages, invent or modify algorithms, sort and classify physical objects, sort and classify digital objects, collect physical objects, collect digital objects, and report observations. We found that data types were not constrained by subject domains, a CS program may use multiple types, and DQ requirements and evaluation strategies vary according to the data types. These types are useful for identifying structural similarities among programs across subject domains. We conclude that blanket criticism of the CS data quality is no longer appropriate. In addition to the details of specific programs and variability among individuals, discussions can fruitfully focus on the data types in a program and the specific methods being used for DQ control as dictated or appropriate for the type. Programs can reduce doubts about their DQ by becoming more explicit in communicating their data management practices.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Reference61 articles.
1. The accuracy of citizen science data: a quantitative review;Aceves-Bueno;Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am.,2017
2. “Enhancing the quality and trust of citizen science data,”;Alabri,2010
3. Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science;Anhalt-Depies;Biol. Conserv,2019
4. “Assessing volunteered geographic information (VGI) quality based on contributors' mapping behaviours,”;Bégin,2013
5. The state of automated amateur weather observations;Bell;Weather,2013
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献