Abstract
AbstractCitizen science has been studied intensively in recent years. Nonetheless, the voice of citizen scientists is often lost despite their altruistic and indispensable role. To remedy this deficiency, a survey on the overall experiences of citizen scientists was undertaken. Dimensions investigated include activities, open science concepts, and data practices. However, the study prioritizes knowledge and practices of data and data management. When a broad understanding of data is lacking, the ability to make informed decisions about consent and data sharing, for example, is compromised. Furthermore, the potential and impact of individual endeavors and collaborative projects are reduced. Findings indicate that understanding of data management principles is limited. Furthermore, an unawareness of common data and open science concepts was observed. It is concluded that appropriate training and a raised awareness of Responsible Research and Innovation concepts would benefit individual citizen scientists, their projects, and society.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Balázs B, Mooney P, Nováková E, Bastin L, Jokar Arsanjani J (2021) Data Quality in Citizen Science. In Vohland, K. (ed.). The science of citizen science. Springer, Cham Switzerland. pp. 139–157
2. Binley AD, Bennett JR (2023) The data double standard. Method Ecol Evol 14:1389–1397
3. Bird TJ, Bates AE, Lefcheck JS, Hill NA, Thomson RJ, Edgar GJ, Frusher S (2014) Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biol Conserv 173:144–154
4. Bowser A, Cooper C, de Sherbinin A, Wiggins A, Brenton P, Chuang TR,.... Meloche M (2020) Still in need of norms: the state of the data in citizen science. Citiz Sci Theor Pract 5(18) https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.303
5. Christine DI, Thinyane M (2021) Citizen science as a data-based practice: A consideration of data justice. Patterns (New York, N.Y.) 2:100224
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献