Author:
Fagerlund Janne,Leino Kaisa,Kiuru Noona,Niilo-Rämä Mikko
Abstract
IntroductionDespite the growing importance of teaching and learning computational thinking (CT) through programming in schools, research has shown major individual differences in teachers’ instruction emphasis and students’ skills in these topics.ObjectiveThis study aims to shed further light on the role that teachers’ and students’ programming motivation plays in CT.MethodsThe topic is approached from the viewpoint of the self-determination theory, which can help to understand teachers’ instruction and students’ learning. Our sample consisted of Finnish Grade 8 teachers (N = 1,853) and students (N = 2,546) who participated in the International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS) in 2018. Focusing on teachers’ CT instruction emphasis, students’ CT test scores, and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, we investigate (1) distributions of teachers’ and students’ responses to intrinsic and extrinsic programming motivation questions, (2) associations between teachers’ and students’ programming motivation and their background factors, and (3) associations between programming motivation and teachers’ CT instruction emphasis and students’ CT test scores. The data was analyzed by examining descriptive statistics, computing mean differences and correlation coefficients and by performing (multiple) linear regression models.ResultsThe results showed that teachers had high extrinsic programming motivation, but the extent of their intrinsic programming motivation varied widely based on their prior programming teaching experience, subject taught, and gender. Students, in turn, reported both high intrinsic and extrinsic motivation toward programming, but boys were generally more motivated for programming than girls. High programming motivation was moderately related to teachers’ higher CT instruction emphasis and students’ higher CT test scores.ConclusionThe findings give a strong incentive to pay attention to increasing especially girls’ programming motivation and providing teachers with positive CT experiences relevant to their subject and with a particular objective to increase intrinsic motivation especially among teachers who lack prior programming teaching experience and interest in the topic.
Reference72 articles.
1. Primary school pupils’ attitudes toward learning programming through visual interactive environments.;Asad;World J. Educ.,2016
2. Bringing computational thinking to K–12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?;Barr;ACM Inroads,2011
3. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking.;Brennan;Paper presented at the meeting of AERA 2012,2012
4. Pre-service teachers’ conceptions and reflections of computer programming using scratch: Technological and pedagogical perspectives.;Choi;Int. J. Educ. Media Technol.,2013
5. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献