Teachers’ Learning Profiles in Learning Programming: The Big Picture!

Author:

Saqr Mohammed,Tuominen Ville,Valtonen Teemu,Sointu Erkko,Väisänen Sanna,Hirsto Laura

Abstract

Currently there is a need for studying learning strategies within Massive Open Online Courses | (MOOCs), especially in the context of in-service teachers. This study aims to bridge this gap and try to understand how in-service teachers approach and regulate their learning in MOOCs. In particular, it examines the strategies used by the in-service teachers as they study a course on how to teach programming. The study implemented a combination of unsupervised clustering and process mining in a large MOOC (n = 27,538 of which 8,547 completed). The results show similar trends compared to previous studies conducted within MOOCs, indicating that teachers are similar to other groups of students based on their learning strategies. The analysis identified three subgroups (i.e., clusters) with different strategies: (1) efficient (n = 3596, 42.1%), (2) clickers (n = 1785, 20.9%), and (3) moderates (n = 3,166, 37%). The efficient students finished the course in a short time, spent more time on each lesson, and moved forward between lessons. The clickers took longer to complete the course, repeated the lessons several times, and moved backwards to revise the lessons repeatedly. The moderates represented an intermediate approach between the two previous clusters. As such, our findings indicate that a significant fraction within teachers poorly regulate their learning, and therefore, teacher education should emphasize learning strategies and self-regulating learning skills so that teacher can better learn and transfer their skills to students.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Education

Reference45 articles.

1. Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues.;Azevedo;Educ. Psychol.,2015

2. Learning analytics for blended learning-a systematic review of theory, methodology, and ethical considerations.;Bergdahl;Int. J. Learn. Anal. Artif. Intell. Educ.,2020

3. Self-regulated learning: where we are today.;Boekaerts;Int. J. Educ. Res.,1999

4. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain.;Borko;Educ. Res.,2004

5. Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: analytical abstractions and everyday experience;Entwistle;Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles,2001

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Why Learning and Teaching Learning Analytics is Hard: An Experience from a Real-Life LA Course Using LA Methods;Lecture Notes in Educational Technology;2024

2. Learning Analytics in Supporting Teaching and Learning: Pedagogical Perspectives;Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age;2024

3. Dissimilarity-Based Cluster Analysis of Educational Data: A Comparative Tutorial Using R;Learning Analytics Methods and Tutorials;2024

4. The Why, the How and the When of Educational Process Mining in R;Learning Analytics Methods and Tutorials;2024

5. Multimodal Learning Analytics for Educational Digital Storytelling;Perspectives on Learning Analytics for Maximizing Student Outcomes;2023-10-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3