Assessment of the Brazilian postgraduate evaluation system

Author:

McManus Concepta,Baeta Neves Abilio Afonso,Souza Filho Antonio Gomes,Rosa Arthur Antonio Silva,Carvalho Carlos Henrique,Freire Denise Maria Guimarães,Fioravanti Maria Clorinda Soares,Báo Sonia Nair,de Medeiros Isac Almeida,Diniz-Filho José Alexandre,Diaz Bruno Lourenço,de Carvalho Ernani Rodrigues,Audy Jorge Luís Nicolas,Silva-Filho Marcio C.,Gimenez Juliano,Carvalho Margarida,da Silva Robério Rodrigues,Napimoga Marcelo Henrique

Abstract

The present study provided an overview of evaluation data from the “Sucupira Platform,” questionnaires with post-graduate deans, discussion forums, and international databases to assess the Brazilian post-graduate evaluation system. The system is highly standardised and homogenous throughout the country with little flexibility. There is a disconnect with ongoing changes in international graduate studies, especially regarding the possibility of adopting flexible and temporary doctoral projects in international partnerships. The evaluation focuses mainly on process, not results, impact, and social relevance. Although the current system requires strategic planning and self-assessment, these are not used when evaluating results. The system should be sensitive to differences, valuing the diversity of institutional projects. Changes in the evaluation require a clear timeline and careful definition of indicators. The improvement of information collection must occur in coordination with CNPq, and the new data collecting platform must be able to import information from various sources (RAIS, Lattes, WIPO, PrInt, etc.). According to their purposes, the separate indication in CAPES’ spreadsheets on the legal status of private and community/confessional institutions is fundamental for improved data analysis. The assignment of grades rather than scores (e.g., in implementation, consolidated nationally/internationally) is questioned.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Education

Reference74 articles.

1. O Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação da Universidade Federal de São Carlos: um estudo sobre sua história e o perfil dos seus alunos;Abramowicz;Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação.,2009

2. A pós-graduação em Sociologia e a experiência de avaliação da CAPES;Adorno;Revista Brasileira de Sociologia.,2018

3. Effective strategies that enhance the social impact of social sciences and humanities research;Aiello;Evidence Policy J. Res. Debate Pract.,2021

4. Princípios para um novo modelo de avaliação da pós-graduação;Alexandre Netto;Ciência e Cultura.,2018

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3