Author:
Bogenschutz Matthew,Dinora Parthenia,Lineberry Sarah,Prohn Seb,Broda Michael,West Angela
Abstract
Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are vital for supporting people with IDD to live well in their communities, but there are not set standards for monitoring quality outcomes related to HCBS. In this paper, we propose promising practices for improving the quality of HCBS outcome measurement, based both in the literature and our own experience conducting an extensive U.S. state-level study. Specifically, we discuss: (1) using merged administrative datasets, (2) developing high-quality psychometrics that attend to ecological issues in measurement, (3) using advanced statistical analyses, and (4) creating immersive, user-friendly translational dissemination products. We conclude by suggesting what we see as important new frontiers for researchers to consider in order to enhance the quality of HCBS outcome measurement for people with IDD in the future.
Funder
National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference67 articles.
1. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?;Cairney;Health Res Policy Syst.,2017
2. A systemic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers;Oliver;BMC Health Serv Res.,2014
3. Policy and Advocacy: Medicaid2021
4. LarsonSA
EschenbacherHJ
TaylorB
PettingellS
SowersM
BourneML
MinneapolisUniversity of Minnesota, Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community IntegrationIn-Home and Residential Long-Term Supports and Services For Persons With Intellectual or Developmental Disabilities: Status and Trends Through 20172020
5. Instructions, Technical Guide and Review Criteria2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献