Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services

Author:

Bogenschutz Matthew,Dinora Parthenia,Lineberry Sarah,Prohn Seb,Broda Michael,West Angela

Abstract

Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are vital for supporting people with IDD to live well in their communities, but there are not set standards for monitoring quality outcomes related to HCBS. In this paper, we propose promising practices for improving the quality of HCBS outcome measurement, based both in the literature and our own experience conducting an extensive U.S. state-level study. Specifically, we discuss: (1) using merged administrative datasets, (2) developing high-quality psychometrics that attend to ecological issues in measurement, (3) using advanced statistical analyses, and (4) creating immersive, user-friendly translational dissemination products. We conclude by suggesting what we see as important new frontiers for researchers to consider in order to enhance the quality of HCBS outcome measurement for people with IDD in the future.

Funder

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference67 articles.

1. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?;Cairney;Health Res Policy Syst.,2017

2. A systemic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers;Oliver;BMC Health Serv Res.,2014

3. Policy and Advocacy: Medicaid2021

4. LarsonSA EschenbacherHJ TaylorB PettingellS SowersM BourneML MinneapolisUniversity of Minnesota, Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community IntegrationIn-Home and Residential Long-Term Supports and Services For Persons With Intellectual or Developmental Disabilities: Status and Trends Through 20172020

5. Instructions, Technical Guide and Review Criteria2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3