Author:
von Peter Sebastian,Göppert Lena,Ziegenhagen Jenny,Beeker Timo,Glück Rosa,Groth Birte,Groß Uwe,Reinholdt Arne,Boerma Robin,Heißler Matthias,Habicht Juri,Schwarz Julian
Abstract
Background: For people who have experienced mental health crises or psychosocial disabilities, it is considerably more difficult to receive support to participate in work on an equal basis with others. In the town of Geesthacht, in Northern Germany, an integrative care network was implemented that allows for acute psychiatric treatment as well as participation in work and activities. This paper aims to explore the principles, advantages, and challenges of this innovative project.Methodology: Within the context of a participatory and collaborative process evaluation of a prospective controlled cohort study (PsychCare), researchers with and without experiential expertise conducted expert interviews and focus groups to evaluate the experiences of 37 employees, with and without lived experience, from various institutions associated with this care network. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Results: It was the change from financial compensation paid on a daily basis to a global treatment budget that allowed for a significant reduction of hospital beds in Geesthacht and freed up resources to implement a complex care network. Since then, various possibilities for participation, work, and activities for former service users, some of which are compensated financially, have been made available. These developments now allow for a less bureaucratic and often smooth transition from being a service user to involvement in participatory activities in the role of a peer, which is frequently perceived to be empowering and beneficial by participants with lived experience. At the same time, this care model has led to multiple role conflicts and different challenges for all parties involved.Conclusion: This innovative project in Geesthacht demonstrates the multifaceted potential of a global treatment budget system in the field of mental health care. To address certain downsides of the Geesthacht model, further development is necessary.
Funder
Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference42 articles.
1. UnitedNations
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities2016
2. Recovery in Mental Health
3. BundestagD
Gesetz zur Stärkung der Teilhabe und Selbstbestimmung von Menschen mit Behinderungen2016
4. “Ich sehe es tatsächlich als Zwischenschritt” – eine qualitative Analyse der Implementierungsbedingungen und -hürden von Stationsäquivalenter Behandlung in Berlin und Brandenburg;Schwarz;Psychiatrische Praxis,2020
5. Multiperspective and multimethod evaluation of flexible and integrative psychiatric care models in Germany: study protocol of a prospective controlled multicenter observational study (PsychCare);Soltmann
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献