Author:
Huang Xuecheng,Lin Dongxin,Liang Zeyu,Deng Yuping,He Zaopeng,Wang Mian,Tan Jinchuan,Li Yikai,Yang Yang,Huang Wenhua
Abstract
Objective: To compare the mechanical parameters and trajectory while operating the oblique pulling manipulation and the cervical rotation–traction manipulation.Methods: An experimental research measuring kinematics parameter and recording motion trajectories of two cervical manipulations were carried out. A total of 48 healthy volunteers participated in this study, who were randomly divided into two groups of 24 representing each of the two manipulations. A clinician performed two manipulations in two groups separately. A motion capture system was used to monitor and analyze kinematics parameters during the operation.Results: The two cervical manipulations have similar thrust time, displacement, mean velocity, max velocity, and max acceleration. There were no significant differences in active and passive amplitudes between the two cervical rotation manipulations. The thrust amplitudes of the oblique pulling manipulation and the cervical rotation–traction manipulation were 5.735 ± 3.041° and 2.142 ± 1.742°, respectively. The thrust amplitudes of the oblique pulling manipulation was significantly greater than that of the cervical rotation–traction manipulation (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Compared with the oblique pulling manipulation, the cervical rotation–traction manipulation has a less thrust amplitudes.
Subject
Biomedical Engineering,Histology,Bioengineering,Biotechnology
Reference37 articles.
1. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.;Anderst;Spine J.,2018
2. Cluster-based upper body marker models for three-dimensional kinematic analysis: comparison with an anatomical model and reliability analysis.;Boser;J. Biomech.,2018
3. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis.;Bronfort;Spine J.,2004
4. Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine: a three-armed, single-blinded, placebo, randomized controlled trial.;Chaibi;Eur. J. Neurol.,2017
5. Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study.;Feipel;ClinBiomech (Bristol, Avon.),1999
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献