Author:
Runyan Hugh,Petrovic Vid,Edwards Clinton B.,Pedersen Nicole,Alcantar Esmeralda,Kuester Falko,Sandin Stuart A.
Abstract
Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, ∼80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science Applications
Reference27 articles.
1. Coral-Segmentation: Training Dense Labeling Models with Sparse Ground Truth;Alonso,2017
2. Semantic Segmentation from Sparse Labeling Using Multi-Level Superpixels;Alonso,2018
3. CoralSeg: Learning Coral Segmentation from Sparse Annotations;Alonso;J. Field Robot.,2019
4. Generalized Sparse Convolutional Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation of Point Clouds Derived from Tri-stereo Satellite Imagery;Bachhofner;Remote Sens.,2020
5. Automated Annotation of Coral Reef Survey Images;Beijbom,2012
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献