Author:
Froese Logan,Gomez Alwyn,Sainbhi Amanjyot Singh,Slack Trevor,Zeiler Frederick A.
Abstract
Literature pertaining to traumatic brain injury care involves the mediation and control of secondary brain injury mechanisms, chief among these is cerebral autoregulation. Cerebral autoregulation is frequently assessed through surrogate measures of cerebrovascular reactivity. An important aspect to acknowledge when calculating cerebrovascular reactivity indices is the linearity within two-parent bio-signals or variables. We highlighted the concept of linearity in raw parent bio-signals used for the calculation of the cerebrovascular reactivity index and what potential implications linearity carries for index derivation. Key of which is that the initial differencing or location of the pressure probes does not influence linear methods of cerebral reactivity calculations so long as the slow-wave vasogenic changes are being recorded.
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Neurology
Reference22 articles.
1. Twenty-five years of intracranial pressure monitoring after severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, single-center analysis;Donnelly;Neurosurgery.,2019
2. Association between outcome, cerebral pressure reactivity and slow ICP waves following head injury;Balestreri;Acta Neurochir Suppl.,2005
3. Genetic influences on patient-oriented outcomes in traumatic brain injury: a living systematic review of non-apolipoprotein E single-nucleotide polymorphisms;Zeiler;J Neurotrauma.,2019
4. Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study - the Lancet Neurol;Steyerberg,2019
5. Cerebral blood flow autoregulation and dysautoregulation;Armstead;Anesthesiol Clin.,2016
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献