Twenty-Five Years of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis

Author:

Donnelly Joseph12ORCID,Czosnyka Marek13,Adams Hadie1,Cardim Danilo14,Kolias Angelos G15,Zeiler Frederick A678,Lavinio Andrea6,Aries Marcel19,Robba Chiara610,Smielewski Peter1,Hutchinson Peter J A1511,Menon David K56,Pickard John D111,Budohoski Karol P1511

Affiliation:

1. Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

2. Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

3. Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

5. NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

6. Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

7. Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

8. Clinician Investigator Program, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

9. Department of Intensive Care, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands

10. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

11. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Intracranial pressure (ICP) is a clinically important variable after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and has been monitored, along with clinical outcome, for over 25 yr in Addenbrooke's hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom. This time period has also seen changes in management strategies with the implementation of protocolled specialist neurocritical care, expansion of neuromonitoring techniques, and adjustments of clinical treatment targets. OBJECTIVE To describe the changes in intracranial monitoring variables over the past 25 yr. METHODS Data from 1146 TBI patients requiring ICP monitoring were analyzed. Monitored variables included ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and the cerebral pressure reactivity index (PRx). Data were stratified into 5-yr epochs spanning the 25 yr from 1992 to 2017. RESULTS CPP increased sharply with specialist neurocritical care management (P < 0.0001) (introduction of a specific TBI management algorithm) before stabilizing from 2000 onwards. ICP decreased significantly over the 25 yr of monitoring from an average of 19 to 12 mmHg (P < 0.0001) but PRx remained unchanged. The mean number of ICP plateau waves and the number of patients developing refractory intracranial hypertension both decreased significantly. Mortality did not significantly change in the cohort (22%). CONCLUSION We demonstrate the evolving trends in neurophysiological monitoring over the past 25 yr from a single, academic neurocritical care unit. ICP and CPP were responsive to the introduction of an ICP/CPP protocol while PRx has remained unchanged.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Reference55 articles.

1. Cerebral protection in severe brain injury: physiological determinants of outcome and their optimisation;Menon;Br Med Bull,1999

2. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care;Le Roux;Neurocritical Care,2014

3. Continuous intracranial manometry; physiopathologic and clinical significance of the method;Guillaume;La Presse Médicale,1951

4. Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice;Lundberg;Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl,1959

5. Intracranial-pressure changes following head injury;Johnston;Lancet North Am Ed,1970

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3