Comparison of dural puncture and dural incision in deep brain stimulation surgery: A simple but worthwhile technique modification

Abstract

BackgroundThe accuracy of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode placement is influenced by a myriad of factors, among which pneumocephalus and loss of cerebrospinal fluid that occurs with dural opening during the surgery are considered most important. This study aimed to describe an effective method for decreasing pneumocephalus by comparing its clinical efficacy between the two different methods of opening the dura.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively compared two different methods of opening the dura in 108 patients who underwent bilateral DBS surgery in our center. The dural incision group comprised 125 hemispheres (58 bilateral and 9 unilateral) and the dural puncture group comprised 91 (41 bilateral and 9 unilateral). The volume of intracranial air, dural opening time, intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MERs), postoperative electrode displacement, clinical efficacy, and complications were examined. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to identify factors associated with the volume of intracranial air and postoperative electrode displacement.ResultsThe volume of intracranial air was significantly lower (0.35 cm3 vs. 5.90 cm3) and dural opening time was significantly shorter (11s vs. 35s) in the dural puncture group. The volume of intracranial air positively correlated with dural opening time. During surgery, the sensorimotor area was longer (2.47 ± 1.36 mm vs. 1.92 ± 1.42 mm) and MERs were more stable (81.82% vs. 47.73%) in the dural puncture group. Length of the sensorimotor area correlated negatively with the volume of intracranial air. As intracranial air was absorbed after surgery, significant anterior, lateral, and ventral electrode displacement occurred; the differences between the two groups were significant (total electrode displacement, 1.0mm vs. 1.4mm). Electrode displacement correlated positively with the volume of intracranial air. Clinical efficacy was better in the dural puncture group than the dural incision group (52.37% ± 16.18% vs. 43.93% ± 24.50%), although the difference was not significant.ConclusionOur data support the hypothesis that opening the dura via puncture rather than incision when performing DBS surgery reduces pneumocephalus, shortens dural opening time, enables longer sensorimotor area and more stable MERs, minimizes postoperative electrode displacement, and may permit a better clinical efficacy.