Author:
Lindner Katharina-Theresa,Nusser Lena,Gehrer Karin,Schwab Susanne
Abstract
Addressing students’ individual needs is a crucial component of inclusive teaching. However, empirical evidence comparing practices such as differentiation and grouping strategies within inclusive, regular and special classes is still lacking. The present study contrasts these settings using data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). Data from 1034 teachers (755 regular, 89 inclusive, 190 special teachers) teaching the subject German in secondary school (grade 5 to grade 8) were used. Results show the highest use of differentiation in special school classes. Teachers’ use the majority of grouping practices to a similar extent when comparing the three educational settings. Class size and the number of students with migration background were predictors for teachers’ use of differentiation, whereas patterns of grouping strategies were predicted by students’ gender and teachers’ experience.
Reference69 articles.
1. Engaging with the views of students to promote inclusion in education.;Ainscow;J. Educ. Change,2018
2. Distributed leadership in context: teacher leaders’ contributions to novice teacher induction.;Anthony;J. Sch. Leaders.,2019
3. Sampling designs of the National Educational Panel Study: challenges and solutions.;Aßmann;Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft,2011
4. Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school.;Baines;Int. J. Educ. Res.,2003
5. Three generations of research on class size effects;Blatchford;The American Psychological Association (APA) Educational Psychology Handbook. Vol. 2 Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors,2012
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献