Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts

Published:2017-11-21 Issue: Volume:8 Page:
ISSN:1664-1078
Container-title:Frontiers in Psychology
language:
Short-container-title:Front. Psychol.

Author:

Calderon Sofia,Mac Giolla Erik,Granhag Pär Anders,Ask Karl

Funder

Vetenskapsrådet

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Psychology

Reference25 articles.

1. GLOMOsys: a systems account of global versus local processing.;Förster;Psychol. Inq.,2010

2. Suspects’ verbal counter-interrogation strategies: towards an integrative model;Granhag;Deception Detection: Current Challenges and New Approaches,2015

3. Preventing future crimes: identifying markers of true and false intent.;Granhag;Eur. Psychol.,2014

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. To deceive, lie and omit: developmental, contextual and educational factors (Engañar, mentir y omitir: factores evolutivos, contextuales y educativos);Journal for the Study of Education and Development;2023-06-26

2. Temporal distance and veracity effects on the level of detail in statements about intentions;Applied Cognitive Psychology;2022-12-25

3. Uncertainty to Avoid Entrapment: Comparing Internet Stings to Real Victim Conversations;Explainable AI and Other Applications of Fuzzy Techniques;2021-07-28

4. Construal-level priming does not modulate memory performance in Deese-Roediger/McDermott paradigm;Memory;2020-09-21

5. Effects of Self-Affirmation Feedback on Exercise Intention of Women in Their Twenties Depending on Construal Level;Psychological Reports;2020-01-22