Author:
Chuey Aaron,Asaba Mika,Bridgers Sophie,Carrillo Brandon,Dietz Griffin,Garcia Teresa,Leonard Julia A.,Liu Shari,Merrick Megan,Radwan Samaher,Stegall Jessa,Velez Natalia,Woo Brandon,Wu Yang,Zhou Xi J.,Frank Michael C.,Gweon Hyowon
Abstract
Online data collection methods are expanding the ease and access of developmental research for researchers and participants alike. While its popularity among developmental scientists has soared during the COVID-19 pandemic, its potential goes beyond just a means for safe, socially distanced data collection. In particular, advances in video conferencing software has enabled researchers to engage in face-to-face interactions with participants from nearly any location at any time. Due to the novelty of these methods, however, many researchers still remain uncertain about the differences in available approaches as well as the validity of online methods more broadly. In this article, we aim to address both issues with a focus on moderated (synchronous) data collected using video-conferencing software (e.g., Zoom). First, we review existing approaches for designing and executing moderated online studies with young children. We also present concrete examples of studies that implemented choice and verbal measures (Studies 1 and 2) and looking time (Studies 3 and 4) across both in-person and online moderated data collection methods. Direct comparison of the two methods within each study as well as a meta-analysis of all studies suggest that the results from the two methods are comparable, providing empirical support for the validity of moderated online data collection. Finally, we discuss current limitations of online data collection and possible solutions, as well as its potential to increase the accessibility, diversity, and replicability of developmental science.
Reference30 articles.
1. The MTurkification of social and personality psychology.;Anderson;Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.,2019
2. You’re surprised at her success? Inferring competence from emotional responses to performance outcomes;Asaba;Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,2020
3. What’s in a look?;Aslin;Dev. Sci.,2007
4. Nonverbal overload: a theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue.;Bailenson;Technol. Mind Behav.,2021
5. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?.;Baron-Cohen;Cognition,1985
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献