Psychometric validation of the 15-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery in Spain (QPR-15-SP)

Author:

Goodman-Casanova Jessica Marian,Cuesta-Lozano Daniel,Alupoaei Catalina,Grasa Bello Eva María,Herrera-Imbroda Jesús,Mayoral-Cleries Fermin,Guzman-Parra Jose

Abstract

IntroductionReliable and valid instruments are needed to measure the impact of mental health services and programs on the journeys of recovery of service users. The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the cross-culturally adapted 15-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery in Spain (QPR-15-SP).MethodsOne hundred and ten participants from three locations in Spain (Málaga, Barcelona and Madrid), who were users of primary and specialized mental health services, were interviewed from October 2021 to June 2022.ResultsThe internal consistency obtained was excellent: ω  =.93 and α =.92. Temporal reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients was moderate (ICC=.684, p <.000). Regarding convergent validity, the QPR-15-SP had a moderate correlation with the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) (ρ =-.500, p <.000), a Visual Numeric Recovery Scale (VNRS) (ρ =.591, p <.000), and the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI) (r =.566, p <.000). Correlations between advanced stages of recovery and higher QPR-15-SP scores were found (Moratorium: ρ  =-.579, p <.000; Awareness: ρ =-.130, p =.189; Preparation: r =-.043, P=.665; Rebuilding: r =.460, p <.000; Growth: ρ  =.697, p <.000). In terms of divergent validity, the QPR-15-SP had low correlation with the DUKE-UNC Functional Social Support Scale (ρ =.273, p <.005). The confirmatory factor analysis of the 1-factor structure obtained reasonable goodness of fit indexes.DiscussionThe QPR-15-SP has acceptable psychometric properties, providing support for measuring recovery in Spain and allowing international comparison research.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Psychology

Reference51 articles.

1. Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness;Andresen;Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry,2006

2. Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures;Anthoine;Health Qual. Life Outcomes,2014

3. Measuring personal recovery–psychometric properties of the Swedish questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR-Swe);Argentzell;Nord. J. Psychiatry,2017

4. A core approach to practice-based evidence: a brief history of the origins and applications of the CORE-OM and CORE system;Barkham;Counsel. Psychother. Res.,2006

5. Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de apoyo social funcional Duke-UNC-11 | Atención Primaria;Bellón Saameño;Atención Primaria,1996

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effectiveness of museum‐based participatory arts in mental health recovery;International Journal of Mental Health Nursing;2023-07-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3